I. Antecedents
José Antonio Villarreal, Pocho (1959)
José Antonio Villareal’s novel Pocho: A Novel About a Young Mexican American Coming of Age in California (1959) was considered to be the first Latino novel published in English prior to the archival work undertaken by Rosaura Sánchez and Beatrice Pita.
II. Tomás Rivera (1935—1984)
...And the Earth Did Not Devour Him (1971)
III. Literary history and Earth
a. Truncated Comparisons
William Faulkner, As I Lay Dying (1930)
Juan Rulfo, Pedro Páramo (1944)
B. Intertext
Nellie Campobello, Cartucho (1931)
IV.Futures
The Short Life of José Antonio Gutierrez
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Ballad of Gregorio Cortez
It would be useful to review Américo Paredes' "With His Pistol In His Hand": A Border Ballad and Its Hero. Other items of note include samples of corridos.
Bill for prosecution of Gregorio Cortez
The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez (1982), dir. Robert M. Young
Edward James Olmos / Gregorio Cortez
James Gammon / Sheriff Frank Fly
Tom Bower / Boone Choate
Bruce McGill / Reporter Blakely
Brion James / Captain Rogers
Alan Vint / Mike Trimmell
Timothy Scott / Sheriff Morris
Pepe Serna / Romaldo Cortez
Michael McGuire / Sheriff Glover
William Sanderson / Cowboy
Barry Corbin / Abernathy
Jack Kehoe / Prosecutor Pferson
Rosanna DeSoto / Carlota Muñoz
Buddy Vigil / Skin
Zach Porter / Fly's Posse
Bill for prosecution of Gregorio Cortez
The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez (1982), dir. Robert M. Young
Edward James Olmos / Gregorio Cortez
James Gammon / Sheriff Frank Fly
Tom Bower / Boone Choate
Bruce McGill / Reporter Blakely
Brion James / Captain Rogers
Alan Vint / Mike Trimmell
Timothy Scott / Sheriff Morris
Pepe Serna / Romaldo Cortez
Michael McGuire / Sheriff Glover
William Sanderson / Cowboy
Barry Corbin / Abernathy
Jack Kehoe / Prosecutor Pferson
Rosanna DeSoto / Carlota Muñoz
Buddy Vigil / Skin
Zach Porter / Fly's Posse
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
"Authenticity" and Representational Agency
Last week we discussed how MARB attempts to trump popular renditions of Mexican American men and women through the appeal for inclusion through "whiteness" in The Squatter and the Don. In the video below, representational agency (the mechanism through which subaltern consent is granted, disavowed, or negotiated) gains it's force through the performance of Latino "authenticity," or, more specifically, the performance of Boricua racial and class "authenticity." This "authenticity" elides an exhausted but necessary question Spivak posited in another context, "Can the Subaltern Speak"?
Spivak, who took to task in this foundational essay the work of Foucault and Deleuze, noted how contemporary critical theory’s focus on the elucidation of power formations inadvertently reinscribes colonial domination by purporting to give the subaltern a voice in theory but not in practice. By requiring or suggesting that the dispossessed speak for themselves, the critic obscures her or his own imbrication in a type of knowledge production that ultimately asks the subaltern to reiterate how they have been oppressed. Spivak seems to be saying that knowledge production is neither innocent or disinterested. “Tell me how we conquered you?,” then, might be a more honest but ethically suspect question for the subaltern. This, of course, is not a disavowal of the possibility of radical left critique but merely its precondition. Spivak’s critique of Foucault and Deluze is hardly they are not committed to transformative politics, but rather that they fail to address their complicity in the very system they attempt to elucidate.
How can "representational agency" in this context help us understand MARB's consent and paradoxical disavowal of "the American 1848"? We will attempt to answer this question through analytical and analogical means. However, we will first start with the question's iteration in a very presentist context. The video below will serve as a starting point.
Keywords for MARB's Squatter and the Don:
Race
Nation
History
Gender
Capital
Spivak, who took to task in this foundational essay the work of Foucault and Deleuze, noted how contemporary critical theory’s focus on the elucidation of power formations inadvertently reinscribes colonial domination by purporting to give the subaltern a voice in theory but not in practice. By requiring or suggesting that the dispossessed speak for themselves, the critic obscures her or his own imbrication in a type of knowledge production that ultimately asks the subaltern to reiterate how they have been oppressed. Spivak seems to be saying that knowledge production is neither innocent or disinterested. “Tell me how we conquered you?,” then, might be a more honest but ethically suspect question for the subaltern. This, of course, is not a disavowal of the possibility of radical left critique but merely its precondition. Spivak’s critique of Foucault and Deluze is hardly they are not committed to transformative politics, but rather that they fail to address their complicity in the very system they attempt to elucidate.
How can "representational agency" in this context help us understand MARB's consent and paradoxical disavowal of "the American 1848"? We will attempt to answer this question through analytical and analogical means. However, we will first start with the question's iteration in a very presentist context. The video below will serve as a starting point.
Keywords for MARB's Squatter and the Don:
Race
Nation
History
Gender
Capital
Sunday, February 3, 2008
The Puerto Rican Body Politic
U.S. Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite speaks during a debate in the House Chambers in Washington in this file photo. (ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO / March 20, 2005)
In a stunning collapse of historical, cultural and intellectual memory Ginny Brown-Waite calls residents of Puerto Rico "foreign citizens."
". . . The bill sends hundreds of millions of dollars to people who do not pay federal income taxes, including residents of Puerto Rico and territories like Guam. I do not believe American taxpayer funds should be sent to foreign citizens who do not pay taxes. Americans want an economic stimulus for Dunnellon, Brooksville and Clermont, not for San Juan or Hagatna. As the legislation moves forward, it must be changed to ensure that only federal taxpaying American citizens receive rebate checks."
Dead Citizenship: Guam residents received citizenship in 1950. Puerto Ricans have been U.S. citizens since 1917 when the U.S. needed additional "bodies" at the end of WWI.
Labels:
Ginny Brown-Waite,
historical amnesia,
Puerto Rico
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)